Ethics and Governance for Journal of Business Ethics-myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theEthics and Governance for Journal of Business Ethics. Answer: Thomas White talks about ethical dilemma and gives out solutions on how to weigh the actions and the consequences to reach a pragmatic solution. The answer is to check the consequences of the actions and the other way is to check the actions themselves. Thomas White says that first thing to do is to analyze the consequences and check the repercussions of the actions (White 2008). The second step is to analyze the actions and check them in the light of moral principles of equality, fairness and honesty. The aim is to see if the actions cross a moral line and pose severe ethical problems. The ACA Code of ethics tries to apply reason and morality to solve a dilemma and the goal is to reach a solution which does not hurt anyones moral rights (Green and Workman 2015). Issue: Does the Code of Ethics apply and how will Sally deal with the moral dilemma Analysis: In the present case, Han is a public servant running a website within the state government who has added some confidential information of court cases as links to news channels thereby causing huge embarrassment to the state government. Sally is in charge and is in a moral dilemma as a court has given a publication suppression order recently. Recommendations: By applying the ethical principles of Thomas White it is important for Sally to check the repercussions of the acts of Hans. To reach a cogent conclusion, Sally has to check the consequences of the act and therefore, it can be said that the actions of Han have lead to breach of confidentiality and has caused embarrassment to the State Government. Actions: Following the ACS Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct, Hans has breached the principles of moral conduct and therefore to prevent recurrence of this kind of problem, Han needs to reprimanded and penalized. Chris MacDonald Recognizing the Moral Dimension There is a moral dilemma between Hans right to publication and the right to privacy of the people whose cases are going on in the Court. Interested Parties and their relationships Sally is the IT Manager and Hans works with the state government and he is working under the supervision of Sally. Sally was in charge of the website but she did not check the content of the channel till it went live. Hans provides content on court matters which are under suppression. Parties involved in the case are- Sally (IT Manager), Hans (web developer) and the State Government. Sally and Hans are both working for the state government and are related to each other by virtue of working under the State Government. Values involved: in coming to a fair conclusion, Sally has to consider that the matters under suppression in Court are confidential and therefore bringing those news in the public forum is a breach of privacy of the people whose matters are pending (MacDonald, MacDonald and Norman 2002). Working under Sally and being a public servant, Hans owed a duty to the State Government to perform his duty with utmost care and compassion. In this case, Hans has exercised personal autonomy and without any regard to professional ethics has published information on suppressed court cases. By the activities of Hans, the reputation of the State is at stake and the privacy of citizens are harmed if the news is published. The State has all the authority to keep the matters private till an order is published and therefore a level of trust was leveled on Hans to uphold the integrity of the State. Benefits and Burdens- Benefits: being the web developer for the State, Hans is helping the state in promoting tourism and therefore the State is earning revenues from the tourism thereby enhancing their economy. Hans is beneficial to the State Government. Burdens- the action of Hans has caused embarrassment to the State Government and has also caused emotional hardship to the parties of the ongoing cases whose orders are suppressed. By publishing news of the courtroom matters, Hans has threatened the safety of the parties and has also diminished the powers of the supremacy and integrity of the Court. There have been similar cases where the person infringing the privacy of the parties and hurting the sentiments of the Court have been held guilty. To come to a conclusion, Sally has to discuss with the people who have a stake in the matter and by doing so, it is fair to conclude that upholding the confidentiality of parties is paramount and Hans has failed in that regard. Courts are guided by principles of Ethics and they are the guardians of the rights of the people. The State is responsible for ensuring that the citizens are safe and their rights are guarded. Being a public servant, it is the responsibility of Hans to make sure that the citizens do not feel threatened or their privacy is hampered. It is ethically important and essential to pay attention to the interests of the state and uphold the integrity (Rendtorff 2016). Sally ahs to go with her gut feeling and also convince others into believing that she acted morally and did what was right for the interests of the state. Sally ahs to be sure that the decision she took was moral and she has not committed any wrong in fixing the liability. Reference Green, S. and Workman, K., 2015. Code of conduct.Policy Statement. MacDonald, C., McDonald, M. and Norman, W., 2002. Charitable conflicts of interest.Journal of Business Ethics,39(1-2), pp.67-74. Rendtorff, J.D., 2016. A Business Ethics Approach to Balance. InThe Balanced Company(pp. 49-74). Routledge. White, T.I., 2008. Resolving an ethical dilemma.T. White. Ethics. Business ethics: A.